Anger is like those ruins which smash themselves on what they fall. – Lucius Annaeus Seneca

Angry OceanBefore I knew anything about it, I was attracted to the ideal of philosophy. I thought of it as a practical subject that could make a real difference, that might have wise things to say about everyday worries – like

failing in a job, not having any friends. Philosophy promised something that might sound a little naive, but was in fact rather profound: “the way to learn to be happy.”

And as I found out more, I discovered that there were a few ancient philosophers I was particularly interested in, because they had the wisest things to say about the areas of life that I thought were rather problematic.

Anger

Anger refers especially to that faculty of the mind which subsists between reason and desire and which seeks to direct the latter in accord with the former – a faculty which seeks to ordinate the self and its environment. It is part of the brain response to a perceived threat of pain – mental of physical.

Anger may be expressed actively or passively. When expressed actively, an angry person “lashes out” verbally or physically at a target. When expressed passively, it is often characterized by silent sulking, passive-aggressive behavior, hostility and tension.

Anger is usually magnified and lasts longer when a rational decision is made about the intent of the source of the disturbance. In other words, if one decides the pain infliction was intentional or deliberate, the emotion of anger that results is usually more intense. This also happens when one thinks he can do something to change an unchangeable painful situation.

Getting angry is not a hard thing to achieve. Is is sufficient for one to drive through a city, especially if it is a crowded one, to get very frustrated because of the careless drivers that seem to be everywhere.

The world we live in is a very frustrating one and most of us seem unable to respond very philosophically to it. Anger seems as much a part of our lives today as bad driving and traffic jams.

sponsored links

An interesting thing to know is that anger was even a greater problem in the ancient times than it is now.

Ancient thinking & solutions for anger | Seneca

An article on the benefits of travel that I had written not long ago had its opening quote by Seneca, the most famous and popular philosopher of his day. He authored more than 20 books of practical advice about all aspects of life.

Lucius Annaeus Seneca (often referred to simply as Seneca, or Seneca the Younger) was a Roman philosopher, statesman and dramatist. Born in Corduba, Hispania (today’s Spain), about 3 B.C., Seneca was the second son of Helvia and Marcus Annaeus Seneca, a wealthy rhetorician known as Seneca the Elder.

Tradition relates that Seneca he was a sickly child (suffering from tuberculosis) and that he was taken to Rome for schooling, where he was trained in rhetoric and was introduced into Stoic philosophy by Attalos and Sotion.

Around AD 37, Seneca was nearly killed as a result of a conflict with the Emperor Caligula who only spared him because he believed the sickly Seneca would not live long anyway. In AD 41, Messalina, wife of the Emperor Claudius, persuaded Claudius to have Seneca banished to Corsica on a charge of adultery with Julia Livilla (one of Caligula’s sisters). He spent his exile in philosophical and natural study and wrote the Consolations.

In AD 49, Claudius’ new wife Agrippina had Seneca recalled to Rome to tutor her son, Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus, the future emperor Nero.

Seneca acted as Nero’s advisor for eight years from 54 to 62. Seneca’s influence was said to be especially strong in the first year and many historians consider Nero’s early rule with Seneca and the praetorian prefect Sextus Afranius Burrus to be quite competent. Over time however, Seneca and Burrus lost their influence over Nero.

With the death of Burrus in 62 and accusations of embezzlement, Seneca retired and devoted his time to more study and writing.

In AD 65, Seneca was charged with being a co-conspirator in the Pisonian conspiracy (a conspiration in which he probably wasn’t involved), a plot to kill the emperor Nero. Rather than face execution, Seneca chose to slit his wrists.

During his time as advisor of the emperor Nero, Seneca saw very much anger first hand. He even dedicated a whole book, titled “On Anger”, to the subject.

“The most hideous and frenzy of all emotions” he called it. But, crucially, he refused to see it as an irrational outburst, something over which we have no control.

Seneca thought anger was a philosophical problem and that it should be treated with philosophical arguments.

Anger arises from certain rationally held ideas about the world. And the problem with these ideas is that they are far too optimistic.

In Seneca’s analysis, people get angry because they’re too hopeful, too optimistic.

Optimism is an outlook on life such that one maintains a view of the world as a positive place. An optimistic view of life is the overarching mental state wherein people believe that things will more likely go well for them than go badly.

Whenever we get angry there’s an element of surprise of self pity and injustice. When we expect things to go our way and they don’t, we tend to get angry. What Seneca would say is that “bad” things (in the optimistic perception) are neither unfair or surprising. They are predictable features of life. The person who gets angry about them simply has the wrong expectations of the world.

Seneca’s first piece of advice: be more pessimistic, adjust your view of the world so is to be less surprised when reversals occur.

He urges us to bear something else in mind too: if we can accept there’s often nothing we can do about our frustrations, we will be less likely to lose our peace of mind when we encounter them.

Seneca believed that one of the reasons we get so angry is because we imagine that things should basically always go our way. This is more of a problem these days as there is an explosion of “advice” sources that urge people to be overoptimistic and believe that things can always go their way, that they should be able to make the world conform to their wishes.

The reality is that we can’t do that. There are many things that we just have to accept. To make us understand this, Seneca came up with an unusual idea. He said that all of us are esentially rather like dogs, tied to the back of a moving chariot, and the leash is just about long enough to give us some freedom, but not long enough to allow us to move wherever we want. The best way for the dog to have a good life with this constraint is to follow in the direction where he doesn’t want to go than to kick against something that he can’t change. That is because if he kicks against it, he will end up not only going where he doesn’t want to go, but he will also get strangled.

However, we have one advantage over animals: we have reason. And it is reason that gives us the advantage to see what we can change and what we can’t. We may be unable to alter certain events but we’re always able to change our attitude towards them. And its this ability that Seneca believed gave us this distinctive form of freedom.

Seneca’s philosophy isn’t just useful for times when we’re feeling furious, it offers us a way to stay calm and collected whatever life may throw at us.

Being a wealthy person, Seneca noticed a surprising thing in the world around him: being rich tends to make people angrier, not calmer.

Seneca knew of a man, Vedius Pollio, who once hosted a party at which a cup-bearer tripped on a piece of marble, fell, and broke a crystal glass. Vedius was so angered at this that he ordered him thrown to the lampreys.

In Seneca’s analysis, Vedius Pollio believed in a world in which crystal glasses simply don’t get broken. And in a way, all of us are like that.

Seneca believed that the problem with rich people, like Vedius, was that their expectations were absurdly high. If this seems absurd to you, go to an airport and look at the 1st class and the economic class counter; what you will notice is that people tend to shout more at the 1st class counter.

The reason is that the rich believe that money will insulate them from setbacks and frustrations; and that is one of the absurdest expectations of us all.

Seneca’s second piece of advice: lower your expectations.

Another interesting piece of advice coming from Seneca is to meditate. The meditation that he refers to isn’t for relaxation, but for preparation.

We usually tend to reassure people by saying: “don’t worry, it will be fine.” Seneca believed that this cozy advice can potentially be very cruel, because it leaves the target person unprepared if things won’t be fine. So he suggested an opposite strategy.

Seneca’s third piece of advice: every morning, make time for a calm meditation on all the things that might go wrong that day.

Be careful not to start believing that you shouldn’t ever expect things to go to plan. You can expect them to go to plan, but at the same time you must be prepared for the day they don’t.

Balancing the optimistic and the pessimistic sides of our moral, as well as meditating to be prepared for when things don’t go our way, are key elements to living a peaceful life, a life free of frustration and anger.

What do you see in the above picture?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

source: Alain de Botton, Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness – Part 3



Liked this post? Subscribe for updates via RSS or email:
  • Lawrence Cheok

    Hi Armannd,

    Fantastic post! I love the way you tied anger into personal development. This article is both philosophical and yet practical; things which in my opinion are mutually exclusive in many cases.

    I agree that we should not get frustrated about things outside our control. It’s the same as Stephen R. Covey’s teaching that we should focus on things within our circle of influence, and not be overly focus on things outside it.

    However, I don’t agree that pessimism is the way to avoid anger. There’s a subtle but importance difference between resignation to one’s circumstances, and acceptance of one’s circumstance. The difference lies in our attitude towards it.

    Resignation is negative and degenerating; it results in people who complain and whine; people who keep circling around their limitations. Nothing gets done or improve with this attitude.

    Acceptance is graceful and magnanimous; it results in people who tries to make the best of their constraints and circumstances. It means understanding what are those things that we can do, those we can’t control AND THEN MOVE ON. The attitude is always constructive.

    When we have acceptance, we do the best within our constraints and we live with the results; taking consolation and assurance knowing that what matters is we have given our best. As such, there is little frustration and anger.

    My two cents worth :mrgreen:

  • Lawrence Cheok

    Hi Armannd,

    Fantastic post! I love the way you tied anger into personal development. This article is both philosophical and yet practical; things which in my opinion are mutually exclusive in many cases.

    I agree that we should not get frustrated about things outside our control. It’s the same as Stephen R. Covey’s teaching that we should focus on things within our circle of influence, and not be overly focus on things outside it.

    However, I don’t agree that pessimism is the way to avoid anger. There’s a subtle but importance difference between resignation to one’s circumstances, and acceptance of one’s circumstance. The difference lies in our attitude towards it.

    Resignation is negative and degenerating; it results in people who complain and whine; people who keep circling around their limitations. Nothing gets done or improve with this attitude.

    Acceptance is graceful and magnanimous; it results in people who tries to make the best of their constraints and circumstances. It means understanding what are those things that we can do, those we can’t control AND THEN MOVE ON. The attitude is always constructive.

    When we have acceptance, we do the best within our constraints and we live with the results; taking consolation and assurance knowing that what matters is we have given our best. As such, there is little frustration and anger.

    My two cents worth :mrgreen:

  • http://armannd.com/ Titus-Armand

    Hello Lawrence,

    Thanks for stopping by!

    About philosophy being unpractical… I think you’re referring to the philosophy of the last century, the period in which philosophy has been killed and dissected.
    True philosophy is the most practical of all sciences, but a debate on this subject is not the point here.

    “However, I don’t agree that pessimism is the way to avoid anger.”

    Neither do I, and neither did Seneca! Getting this kind of idea from the post is a (rather big) misinterpretation on your side. If you read the first advice correctly, you’ll understand why a certain word is there: “be more pessimistic.”
    Being more pessimistic does not mean that one should be absolutely pessimistic; it means that one should be less optimistic.

    Acceptance is a useful concept indeed, but in the daily life it is too easy to slip from acceptance into resignation… so I think acceptance is a dangerous word to be used in the context – it can potentially do more harm than good.
    The basic “optimism” and “pessimism” work too well to be looking for replacement terms. Plus, simple is better – and safer.

    PS: The teachings of Stephen R. Covey are not really his own. It’s the philosophy of the ancients dressed in new clothes. What this means is that you – and many other people – agree to the fact that philosophy is a practical subject; the problem is that you’re not aware that you do…

  • http://armannd.com/ Titus-Armand

    Hello Lawrence,

    Thanks for stopping by!

    About philosophy being unpractical… I think you’re referring to the philosophy of the last century, the period in which philosophy has been killed and dissected.
    True philosophy is the most practical of all sciences, but a debate on this subject is not the point here.

    “However, I don’t agree that pessimism is the way to avoid anger.”

    Neither do I, and neither did Seneca! Getting this kind of idea from the post is a (rather big) misinterpretation on your side. If you read the first advice correctly, you’ll understand why a certain word is there: “be more pessimistic.”
    Being more pessimistic does not mean that one should be absolutely pessimistic; it means that one should be less optimistic.

    Acceptance is a useful concept indeed, but in the daily life it is too easy to slip from acceptance into resignation… so I think acceptance is a dangerous word to be used in the context – it can potentially do more harm than good.
    The basic “optimism” and “pessimism” work too well to be looking for replacement terms. Plus, simple is better – and safer.

    PS: The teachings of Stephen R. Covey are not really his own. It’s the philosophy of the ancients dressed in new clothes. What this means is that you – and many other people – agree to the fact that philosophy is a practical subject; the problem is that you’re not aware that you do…

  • Anderson

    Dear……..
    I find this piece of writing very deep.
    But I recognise it from somewhere… hmmmmm….. i wonder where. Oh yeah it’s from that TV show with Alain de Botton, why would you even try to take someone elses work, it is almost the same thing that he says on the program. I am currently studying philosophy at High School and even I know that’s wrong.
    tsk tsk tsk.
    shame on you

  • Anderson

    Dear……..
    I find this piece of writing very deep.
    But I recognise it from somewhere… hmmmmm….. i wonder where. Oh yeah it’s from that TV show with Alain de Botton, why would you even try to take someone elses work, it is almost the same thing that he says on the program. I am currently studying philosophy at High School and even I know that’s wrong.
    tsk tsk tsk.
    shame on you

  • Anderson

    but thanks for writing it out, big help!

  • Anderson

    but thanks for writing it out, big help!

  • http://armannd.com/ Titus-Armand

    You are, of course, right. But I’m still wondering why did it take so long for someone to figure it out/say it.

    PS: edited the post to include the source.

  • http://armannd.com/ Titus-Armand

    You are, of course, right. But I’m still wondering why did it take so long for someone to figure it out/say it.

    PS: edited the post to include the source.

  • DAG

    I was looking for info about Seneca, and this is a nice post. Thanks.

  • DAG

    I was looking for info about Seneca, and this is a nice post. Thanks.

  • http://www.knowledgereform.com/ Jason Cooper

    Fantastic Post! I have just done a similar piece on dealing with anger using stoicism and self-help.

    Expect a pingback, as I have posted a link to this post on my part 1 of Anger article that I will publish tomorrow.

    Cheers!

  • http://www.knowledgereform.com/ Jason Cooper

    Fantastic Post! I have just done a similar piece on dealing with anger using stoicism and self-help.

    Expect a pingback, as I have posted a link to this post on my part 1 of Anger article that I will publish tomorrow.

    Cheers!

  • http://7stringbass.info 7 String Bass

    The post already been superb and possess known it to many associated with my. We honor for the actual work you done. a person once again.

  • http://7stringbass.info 7 String Bass

    The post already been superb and possess known it to many associated with my. We honor for the actual work you done. a person once again.

  • Bob Ama

    You appear to have copied his work directly.

  • Pingback: Conveyancing Solicitor

  • http://armannd.com/ Titus-Armand

    Oh calm down and spare me your outrage.