<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The good things in life are other people</title> <atom:link href="http://armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html/</link> <description>Things that matter</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Titus-Armand</title><link>http://armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link> <dc:creator>Titus-Armand</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:06:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html#comment-619</guid> <description>One question for you, Lukiano: if conversations are a lot better, why do we know so little about each others and about ourselves? Do we need more conversations?... I doubt it. :) Conversations *could* be useful, but that would mean taking the *LONG* (very long) road.I&#039;ve always had interesting conversations with my parents, but they still know little, close to nothing, about me.I would really like to know why do you think conversations would be &quot;a lot&quot; better.PS: I&#039;m a little confused about the part with &quot;argument their point of view.&quot; If you want to know more about me, why would I need to argument who I am? Whether you agree with who I am or not, you know who I am. That was the point of the interview. The argumentation part *could* follow, in the form of a conversation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One question for you, Lukiano: if conversations are a lot better, why do we know so little about each others and about ourselves? Do we need more conversations?&#8230; I doubt it. :) Conversations *could* be useful, but that would mean taking the *LONG* (very long) road.</p><p>I&#8217;ve always had interesting conversations with my parents, but they still know little, close to nothing, about me.</p><p>I would really like to know why do you think conversations would be &#8220;a lot&#8221; better.</p><p>PS: I&#8217;m a little confused about the part with &#8220;argument their point of view.&#8221; If you want to know more about me, why would I need to argument who I am? Whether you agree with who I am or not, you know who I am. That was the point of the interview. The argumentation part *could* follow, in the form of a conversation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Titus-Armand</title><link>http://armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html/comment-page-1/#comment-53924</link> <dc:creator>Titus-Armand</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html#comment-53924</guid> <description>One question for you, Lukiano: if conversations are a lot better, why do we know so little about each others and about ourselves? Do we need more conversations?... I doubt it. :) Conversations *could* be useful, but that would mean taking the *LONG* (very long) road.I&#039;ve always had interesting conversations with my parents, but they still know little, close to nothing, about me.I would really like to know why do you think conversations would be &quot;a lot&quot; better.PS: I&#039;m a little confused about the part with &quot;argument their point of view.&quot; If you want to know more about me, why would I need to argument who I am? Whether you agree with who I am or not, you know who I am. That was the point of the interview. The argumentation part *could* follow, in the form of a conversation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One question for you, Lukiano: if conversations are a lot better, why do we know so little about each others and about ourselves? Do we need more conversations?&#8230; I doubt it. :) Conversations *could* be useful, but that would mean taking the *LONG* (very long) road.</p><p>I&#8217;ve always had interesting conversations with my parents, but they still know little, close to nothing, about me.</p><p>I would really like to know why do you think conversations would be &#8220;a lot&#8221; better.</p><p>PS: I&#8217;m a little confused about the part with &#8220;argument their point of view.&#8221; If you want to know more about me, why would I need to argument who I am? Whether you agree with who I am or not, you know who I am. That was the point of the interview. The argumentation part *could* follow, in the form of a conversation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lukiano</title><link>http://armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html/comment-page-1/#comment-617</link> <dc:creator>lukiano</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:54:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html#comment-617</guid> <description>Oh my God! I&#039;d really like to contradict with you but this time you&#039;re absolutely right. But (yes, there&#039;s a but :D ) I don&#039;t think people should find out things about each other with the help of interviews, conversations are a lot better. Plus, I would feel awkward if someone would interview me. Instead,both persons could answer  questions and (very important) argument their point of view.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my God! I&#8217;d really like to contradict with you but this time you&#8217;re absolutely right.<br /> But (yes, there&#8217;s a but :D ) I don&#8217;t think people should find out things about each other with the help of interviews, conversations are a lot better. Plus, I would feel awkward if someone would interview me. Instead,both persons could answer  questions and (very important) argument their point of view.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lukiano</title><link>http://armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html/comment-page-1/#comment-53923</link> <dc:creator>lukiano</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html#comment-53923</guid> <description>Oh my God! I&#039;d really like to contradict with you but this time you&#039;re absolutely right. But (yes, there&#039;s a but :D ) I don&#039;t think people should find out things about each other with the help of interviews, conversations are a lot better. Plus, I would feel awkward if someone would interview me. Instead,both persons could answer  questions and (very important) argument their point of view.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my God! I&#8217;d really like to contradict with you but this time you&#8217;re absolutely right.<br /> But (yes, there&#8217;s a but :D ) I don&#8217;t think people should find out things about each other with the help of interviews, conversations are a lot better. Plus, I would feel awkward if someone would interview me. Instead,both persons could answer  questions and (very important) argument their point of view.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Titus-Armand</title><link>http://armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html/comment-page-1/#comment-614</link> <dc:creator>Titus-Armand</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:51:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html#comment-614</guid> <description>Hi Douglas,You make a good point. The interview must be done with passion, because the point of it is to get to know the other person better - not to write a lifeless article for a magazine.I interviewed my mother and the &#039;results&#039; were really surprising! I still have a lot of other people to go. :PThanks for commenting!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Douglas,</p><p>You make a good point. The interview must be done with passion, because the point of it is to get to know the other person better &#8211; not to write a lifeless article for a magazine.</p><p>I interviewed my mother and the &#8216;results&#8217; were really surprising! I still have a lot of other people to go. :P</p><p>Thanks for commenting!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Titus-Armand</title><link>http://armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html/comment-page-1/#comment-53922</link> <dc:creator>Titus-Armand</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html#comment-53922</guid> <description>Hi Douglas,You make a good point. The interview must be done with passion, because the point of it is to get to know the other person better - not to write a lifeless article for a magazine.I interviewed my mother and the &#039;results&#039; were really surprising! I still have a lot of other people to go. :PThanks for commenting!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Douglas,</p><p>You make a good point. The interview must be done with passion, because the point of it is to get to know the other person better &#8211; not to write a lifeless article for a magazine.</p><p>I interviewed my mother and the &#8216;results&#8217; were really surprising! I still have a lot of other people to go. :P</p><p>Thanks for commenting!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Douglas Woods</title><link>http://armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html/comment-page-1/#comment-613</link> <dc:creator>Douglas Woods</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 08:13:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html#comment-613</guid> <description>A great article. I like the idea of conducting an interview. I think many people may be flattered that you ask them for an interview. When doing the interview, though, make sure you listen to their answer and don&#039;t simply wait for them to stop talking, just so that you can jump in with your next question.Doug www.dougwoods.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great article.<br /> I like the idea of conducting an interview. I think many people may be flattered that you ask them for an interview.<br /> When doing the interview, though, make sure you listen to their answer and don&#8217;t simply wait for them to stop talking, just so that you can jump in with your next question.</p><p>Doug<br /> <a href="http://www.dougwoods.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dougwoods.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Douglas Woods</title><link>http://armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html/comment-page-1/#comment-53921</link> <dc:creator>Douglas Woods</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 08:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armannd.com/the-good-things-in-life-are-other-people.html#comment-53921</guid> <description>A great article. I like the idea of conducting an interview. I think many people may be flattered that you ask them for an interview. When doing the interview, though, make sure you listen to their answer and don&#039;t simply wait for them to stop talking, just so that you can jump in with your next question.Doug www.dougwoods.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great article.<br /> I like the idea of conducting an interview. I think many people may be flattered that you ask them for an interview.<br /> When doing the interview, though, make sure you listen to their answer and don&#8217;t simply wait for them to stop talking, just so that you can jump in with your next question.</p><p>Doug<br /> <a href="http://www.dougwoods.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dougwoods.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 861/861 objects using disk: basic

Served from: armannd.com @ 2012-02-11 06:01:31 -->
